A couple embracing among folk dancers in Agrigento, Sicily
Bridges of Virtue · Visual encyclopedia

Neuroscience of Love and Compassion as Virtues

Begin the exploration

How does love become
a way of being?

Love draws together feeling, memory, motivation, attachment, and our understanding of others. Neuroscience illuminates these connections—and invites a deeper question: how do we turn what we feel into the care we practice?

01

History of the Scientific Study of Love

The scientific study of love has progressed from philosophical and psychoanalytic descriptions to evolutionary biology, attachment theory, social psychology, and modern affective neuroscience. Darwinian concepts of attachment and reproductive behavior, Bowlby's attachment theory, and later work on romantic and compassionate love established that love encompasses multiple overlapping processes rather than a single emotion. In the past 25 years, with functional brain imaging such as PET and fMRI, researchers began identifying specific neural systems associated with romantic, maternal, and attachment-related love.

These brain areas include the ventral tegmental area (VTA), caudate nucleus, putamen, hypothalamus, amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). More recent meta-analytic work indicates that the VTA and dopaminergic reward system are particularly important in both maternal and passionate love, while higher cortical regions contribute to emotional regulation and social cognition.

Sources
  • Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss. Vol 1: Attachment. Basic Books; 1969.
  • Bartels A, Zeki S. The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport. 2000;11(17):3829-3834.
  • Nummenmaa L, Hari R, Hietanen JK, Glerean E. Maps of subjective feelings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(37):9198-9203.
Neuroscience imaging equipment in a laboratory
The science of connection.
02

Emotions and Love

Love is generally regarded as an emotion, but rather than a single emotion, it is a complex state involving reward, motivation, attachment, pleasure, arousal, security, longing, empathy, and sometimes anxiety or fear of loss. The VTA and nucleus accumbens/ventral striatum contribute to reward and motivational salience, while the hypothalamus and neuroendocrine systems contribute to attachment and reproductive behavior. The amygdala, anterior insula, and ACC contribute to emotional salience, interoception, and processing of socially relevant stimuli, while the mPFC and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) contribute to valuation and regulation.

Compassion is closely connected to love and appears to involve partially overlapping, but distinguishable circuitry, including brain areas such as the periaqueductal gray (PAG), anterior insula, ACC, and inferior frontal gyrus.

Sources
  • Zeki S. The neurobiology of love. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(14):2575-2579.
  • Kim JJ, Cunnington R, Kirby JN. The neurophysiological basis of compassion: an fMRI meta-analysis of compassion and its related neural processes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;108:112-123.
  • Acevedo BP, Aron A, Fisher HE, Brown LL. Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012;7(2):145-159.
03

Cognitions and Love

Although love is profoundly emotional, love is also strongly influenced by cognition. Cognitive processes help us assess how we perceive another person, remember shared experiences, infer intentions, evaluate trustworthiness, and regulate our own responses. The medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus, temporoparietal junction (TPJ), superior temporal sulcus, and temporal poles are components of networks involved in social cognition, mentalizing, autobiographical memory, and understanding the mental states of others – empathy.

The hippocampus contributes to memory for emotionally significant relationships, while the OFC and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) participate in assigning value to social experiences. Thus, love involves an ongoing interaction between affective reward systems and cognitive representations of the people and things we love.

Sources
  • Bartels A, Zeki S. The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. Neuroimage. 2004;21(3):1155-1166.
  • Singer T, Lamm C. The social neuroscience of empathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1156:81-96.
  • Preston SD, de Waal FBM. Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav Brain Sci. 2002;25(1):1-20.
04

The Social Part of Love

Love ultimately exists within relationships, making social bonding, attachment, trust, reciprocity, empathy, caregiving, and cooperation central to its expression. The ventral striatum, VTA, hypothalamus, amygdala, ACC, anterior insula, mPFC, TPJ, and PAG form overlapping systems involved in reward, attachment, social cognition, emotional salience, caregiving, and responses to another person's distress. Oxytocin and vasopressin systems, particularly within the hypothalamus and their projections to the limbic and reward circuitry, are also involved in human bonding.

Importantly, mature love becomes visible through service, altruism, caregiving, compassion, and behavior directed toward others, rather than remaining an internal emotional state.

Sources
  • Preston SD, de Waal FBM. Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav Brain Sci. 2002;25(1):1-20.
  • Singer T, Lamm C. The social neuroscience of empathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1156:81-96.
  • Post SG. Altruism and Health: Perspectives From Empirical Research. Oxford University Press; 2007.
Medieval courtly-love illustration of a kneeling man and a woman
Love takes shape between us.
05

Sexuality, Love, and Spirituality

Sexuality, love, and spirituality can be understood as overlapping dimensions of human experience that engage partially shared neural systems involving reward, motivation, emotion, attachment, and self-related processing. Neuroimaging studies suggest that sexual desire and romantic love are neither identical nor completely independent; rather, they share neural mechanisms related to pleasure, motivation, bodily sensation, and social cognition, while love incorporates additional processes related to attachment, reward expectancy, and the formation of enduring interpersonal bonds. Specifically, sexual desire is strongly associated with the autonomic nervous system, hypothalamus, amygdala, striatum, insula, and anterior cingulate cortex, while romantic love additionally recruits dopaminergic reward and attachment circuitry, particularly involving the ventral tegmental area and striatum.

In addition, sexual and spiritual experiences may engage overlapping mechanisms involved in pleasure, emotional intensity, self-transcendence, and the dissolution of boundaries between self and other. This does not mean that sexuality and spirituality are biologically identical or that spiritual experiences are reducible to sexual processes. However, it raises the possibility that the brain's capacity for intense reward, attachment, altered self-representation, and experiences of connectedness provides a common neurobiological substrate through which sexuality, love, and spirituality can intersect.

Sources
  • Cacioppo S, Bianchi-Demicheli F, Frum C, Pfaus JG, Lewis JW. The common neural bases between sexual desire and love: a multilevel kernel density fMRI analysis. J Sex Med. 2012;9(4):1048-1054.
  • Ortigue S, Bianchi-Demicheli F, Patel N, Frum C, Lewis JW. Neuroimaging of love: fMRI meta-analysis evidence toward new perspectives in sexual medicine. J Sex Med. 2010;7(11):3541-3552.
  • Newberg A. Sex, God, and the Brain: How Sexual Pleasure Gave Birth to Religion and a Whole Lot More. Turner Publishing Company; 2024.
06

Oneness, Spirituality, Religion, and Love

Many religious and contemplative traditions conceptualize the highest expression of love as transcending the ordinary distinction between self and other. Neurotheology research that uses brain imaging is particularly relevant because studies of meditation and prayer have implicated changes in the superior parietal lobule (SPL), prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, hippocampus, and amygdala, with decreased activity in portions of the parietal system associated with the usual sense of spatial self-boundaries. This research shows that spiritual experiences are complex and involve distributed brain networks rather than a single “God module”.

These findings provide a potential neuroscientific framework for understanding why experiences described religiously or spiritually as oneness, unity, or self-transcendence are fundamentally connected to feelings of agape, mystical love, or interconnectedness. As a person experiences the profound connection to others, it is expressed as love and compassion to other, all of humanity, or God.

Sources
  • Newberg AB, Alavi A, Baime M, Pourdehnad M, Santanna J, d'Aquili E. The measurement of regional cerebral blood flow during the complex cognitive task of meditation: a preliminary SPECT study. Psychiatry Res. 2001;106(2):113-122.
  • Newberg AB, d'Aquili EG, Rause V. Why God Won't Go Away: Brain Science and the Biology of Belief. Ballantine Books; 2001.
  • Newberg AB. The neuroscientific study of spiritual practices. Front Psychol. 2014;5:215. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00215.
A group gathered around an illuminated orrery in a science demonstration
The self, and what lies beyond it.
07

Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Love and Compassion

Love and compassion appear across virtually all human cultures and religious/spiritual traditions, but their objects, meanings, behavioral expression, and social boundaries can differ substantially. Neuroscience suggests that cultural values influence neural responses to social stimuli, empathy, and the distinction between self and others. Relevant systems include the mPFC, TPJ, ACC, anterior insula, amygdala, and striatum, which participate in mentalizing, empathy, emotional salience, and social valuation.

Cross-cultural research is particularly important because compassion may be directed preferentially toward family, community, religious groups, or humanity more broadly. This raises the question of how cultural learning can expand or constrain the neural and behavioral expression of love, compassion, and prosociality.

Sources
  • Kim HS, Sasaki JY. Cultural neuroscience: biology of the mind in cultural contexts. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:487-514.
  • Cheon BK, Im DM, Harada T, et al. Cultural influences on neural basis of intergroup empathy. Neuroimage. 2011;57(2):642-650.
  • Immordino-Yang MH, Yang XF. Cultural differences in the neural correlates of social-emotional feelings. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;17:34-40.
08

Love Versus Hate in the Brain

Love and hate appear psychologically opposed, but both can involve intense social salience, attention, motivation, and valuation directed toward another person. Romantic love has repeatedly implicated the VTA, striatum/caudate, ACC, and medial prefrontal regions, whereas hate has been associated with regions including the putamen, insula, premotor cortex, and medial frontal areas, reflecting emotional salience, threat, aggression, and behavioral preparation. However, some of the regions involved in hate overlap with regions implicated in romantic love, particularly the insula and the putamen, suggesting that the distinction is not simply between two completely separate neural systems.

The crucial difference may therefore be the valence, appraisal, motivational direction, and behavioral goal assigned to a socially significant person or concept.

Sources
  • Zeki S, Romaya JP. Neural correlates of hate. PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3556. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003556.
  • Bartels A, Zeki S. The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport. 2000;11(17):3829-3834.
  • Zeki S. The neurobiology of love. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(14):2575-2579.
09

Love as Virtue

Understanding love as a virtue represents an important conceptual transition from love as an emotional state to love as a stable disposition to act for the welfare of another. Thus, love can also be considered as an acquired capacity that develops from tolerance and understanding into unselfish concern, gratitude, compassion, and service to others. From a neuroscience perspective, this may involve repeated coordination of prefrontal regulatory systems, the anterior insula and ACC, temporoparietal regions involved in perspective-taking, ventral striatum/reward circuitry, and brainstem caregiving systems such as the PAG.

The critical distinction is that virtue involves not merely experiencing love, but repeatedly translating affect and cognition into intentional prosocial and compassionate behaviors. It appears to follow a general progression as follows:

Feeling → recognizing → valuing → choosing → acting → habituating → becoming
Sources
  • Post SG. Unlimited Love: Altruism, Compassion, and Service. Templeton Foundation Press; 2003.
  • Post SG, Underwood LG, Schloss JP, Hurlbut WB, eds. Altruism and Altruistic Love: Science, Philosophy, and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford University Press; 2002.
  • Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. Oxford University Press; 2004.
Bring the ideas into practice

Explore the brain.
Reflect on the choices.

Enter the two interactive modules →

This content was written and created in collaboration with Dr. Andrew Newberg, M.D.

BRIDGES OF VIRTUE · LOVE · LEARNING · LIVED PRACTICE
Image credits
  • Baci e Abbracci — Eyd0s98, CC BY-SA 4.0. Display cropped with a dark overlay.
  • The neuroscience imaging lab — Rosario Gulino, CC BY-SA 4.0. Display cropped with a dark overlay.
  • Courtly-love illustration — supplied image.
  • Science demonstration painting — Joseph Wright of Derby, A Philosopher Lecturing on the Orrery, 1766. Supplied image. Display cropped with a dark overlay.